Clayton Tucker Must Be Crushed And Humiliated
Working Every Day To Keep Scumbag Socialist Clayton Tucker OUT Of Office
I’m wondering why we don’t see your disgusting pandering to the muzzie invaders anymore, Comrade. Is it because you are running for state-wide office and about 80% of Texans would be repulsed by your muzzie ass licking?
What a fair-weather friend you are to the islamic hordes!
Boy. Comrade Clayton (who has no reputation to wreck since he’s a compulsive liar and a failure who lives with his mother at age 35) sure loves trying to trash the reputations of people more successful than him (everyone) while offering zero proof.
We will set aside for the moment that Clayton Tucker cannot “put the brakes” on any AI center if he wins. Conversely, Nate Sheets can’t order AI data centers to be built. This ENTIRE subject of AI data centers is entirely outside the purview of Ag Commissioner in the first place. He may as well brag about putting the brakes on space shuttle launches. The fact that Comrade Clayton keeps harping on this issue shows you he’s got absolutely nothing else to offer.
The donation Comrade Clayton the communist is referring to is one by James “Jim” Moyer – and it was for $300,000. So he didn’t even get the amount correct.
Jim Moyer is listed as a co-founder of now-public company MPWR almost THIRTY YEARS ago! He has not been a director since 2016 and currently does not sit on the board.
Nate Sheets did NOT take money from MPWR or any other data center company. He took money from a guy who was in tech over a decade ago and has ZERO say in the operations of MPWR. There WERE no AI data centers back in 2016. This information is easy to find yet Clayton Tucker just made a bald-faced lie about Nate Sheets taking money from “data centers” to smear Nate and paint him as being “on the take.”
In legal circles, this is known as “libel” and it’s not the first time Clayton has done it. He libeled Sid Miller so egregiously that when I pointed it out, Clayton had to sneak back into his website and change the wording on his accusations to avoid a lawsuit.
Hopefully, Nate will sue the shit out of Clayton Tucker for this AND for another lie a few days ago about Nate making all his money from “importing.”
For someone who is a political “science” major and who has done nothing his entire life but work on campaigns and run his own campaigns (all of them losers, of course) Clayton Tucker has THE WORST political instincts of anyone I’ve ever seen.
You think “young folks” want to get into agriculture? LOL.
Less than 2% of the population farms. It used to be around 95%. See a pattern there?
If you asked 100 kids what they want to be when they grow up, I bet maybe one or two would say “farmer.” They will say “YouTube star” or “social media influencer” or “athlete.” Some will say fireman and policeman and teacher. Maybe nurse. But not farmer.
Why? Because EVERYONE wants to be rich and do no work for it. That kind of rules out farmer. It’s hard work and there are a lot of headaches (drought, heavy rains, late freezes, early freezes, hail, high winds, spider mites, caterpillars, army worms, grasshoppers, fungus, cucumber beetles, mold, Japanese beetles, etc, etc, etc).
Clayton Tucker HIMSELF is a prime example of this, which makes it all the more ironic and hilarious. According to him, he is a “fifth-generation” rancher. So he was ostensibly HANDED A FREE RANCH and a ton of knowledge (this is all bullshit, but bear with me). Even with ALL that free stuff and a HUGE head start on the average “wanna-be farmer” what is Clayton doing with his time?
He’s certainly not fucking farming, I can tell you that.
No, he’s essentially a “social media influencer” who influences nobody and makes no money doing it. But that STILL didn’t stop him. Like most lazy fucks, he’d rather play around on his phone all day in the nice cool air conditioning and make $0 than go out to the “ranch” and do the shitty work of planting, harvesting, etc.
Just like his assertion that people aren’t eating healthy because it’s too expensive, Clayton is 100% wrong when reading the room. A low IQ will do that to you.
Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: an unemployed loser and socialist who lives with his mother at age 35 is bitter and envious of man who is successful:
Clayton gives ZERO evidence for his outlandish claim. I have read nothing like that in all the articles I have read about Nate.
AI, which has access to every single thing ever written about Nate also disagrees with Comrade Clayton, the envious little twerp:
Just another lie by Clayton Tucker – I think we’re up to about 38 huge lies since I’ve been keeping track.
The truth is, it doesn’t matter to Clayton HOW Nate Sheets made his fortune. The problem for the envious, sad little socialist pussy is the word “fortune.” Clayton has nothing to his name because he is lazy and incompetent. But in his little tiny pea brain, the reason is because “oligarchs” and “monopolists” are “hoarding” all the money. They must have cheated him somehow and stole “his” money.
I have covered this before:
Clayton Tucker Is The Quintessential Grasshopper From Aesop’s Fable.
You see, the lazy incompetent socialist thinks that ANYBODY with wealth MUST have fucked everyone over and stolen it and couldn’t POSSIBLY have made it through hard work or through building a great product that people want badly. Never mind that Nate has provided well-paying jobs for a TON of people and Clayton Tucker has never employed a single person in his life. None of that matters to Clayton. He’s just envious that Nate has a “fortune” at all while Clayton himself lives with his mother.
There was a whole book written about this. It’s called Atlas Shrugged and it’s basically my bible. Clayton is the Wesley Mouch of Atlas Shrugged. A pathetic, weak scumbag who has never built anything in his life and is so envious of successful people, he wants to destroy them. Of course, Wesley Mouch is a politician. He is like Bernie Sanders or Clayton Tucker: sad, weak little pussies who have NEVER had a real job in their lives.
You might remember that Clayton Tucker was once a “beekeeper” years ago. He put it in his profile and then it eventually disappeared in favor of fake cowboy then fake rancher and fake farmer…
My guess is that Terry Tucker bought a bee hive for her aimless son back in 2017 or so and hoped he would maybe do something useful with his life. Clayton got all excited over his little bee hive and started calling himself a “beekeeper” because his resume had absolutely nothing else on it.
Then he probably forgot to feed them sugar water in the winter or was too lazy to go out in the cold to do it or he got stung once and then got scared of the bee hive in his yard. So he quit, like he quits everything else in his life.
Then the “beekeeper” in his profile went away.
I bet he has horrible, shameful memories of fucking up his beekeeping experience and remembers what a failure he was – so to now be running against a REAL beekeeper who made like $100 million must REALLY stick in Clayton’s craw. It is humiliating. You’d’ think Clayton would be used to humiliation by now the same way a fish is used to water, but maybe not.
While Nate was putting the work in all those years, here is what Clayton Tucker was doing:
He was ranting on a street corner demanding “free stuff” as a “political organizer” for a Bernie Sanders radical offshoot group called “Our Revolution.”
And now he’s bitter that he’s broke and living with mom while Nate is sitting on a pile of cash he earned.
Very sad.
In Comrade Clayton’s latest bungled “campaign ad,” he claims that “the system” has been designed to make healthy foods like “veggies expensive” and junk food cheap.
Ummm….no.
“Cheaper than processed snacks” – whoops!
There is a reason almost every person on the planet will choose a bag of Doritos over a handful of carrots: TASTE. Salty, fatty and sugary items taste AWESOME to humans. This is wired into us from our caveman days when food was scarce.
Comrade Clayton should know that junk food is hardly cheap since he has been getting fat on Whataburger, Panda Express and Taco Bell all year.
I was at the store the other day and took pictures of a lot of prices. I calculated that you can basically eat three healthy meals per day for about $12. Breakfast is especially cheap – I can get you an awesome 500 calorie breakfast for about $3.
As a sedentary 5’6 female, Comrade Clayton only needs about 1,700 calories per day to survive. Hell, three eggs (75 cents at HEB) will get you 15% of the way there.
Besides taste, people want convenience because most people are lazy as shit OR they are pressed for time since it now requires TWO earners in a family to make ends meet. Who else is going to pay the taxes for all the billions of dollars being stolen by the illegal Somalis that Clayton Tucker invited into the country??
That is why you see an entire wall at HEB filled with pre-chopped onions, watermelon, cucumbers, etc. There are salads in a bag and pre-cooked meals. These are WAY more expensive on a per-calorie basis.
It is WAY cheaper to buy all the raw ingredients and do all the food prep at home. But that requires you spend 30 or 45 minutes in your kitchen doing…GASP…WORK! You have to peel onions, cut up the chicken breasts, peel potatoes, etc.
Lazy twats like Comrade Clayton would rather pull up to the drive-through at Panda Express and get a huge sugary bowl of noodles with the cream of sum yung guy.
If Comrade Clayton had been paying attention 15 years ago, he’d remember that we already went through this shit with Michelle Obama and her “eat kale for lunch” in the public schools. Guess what? Kids threw it all in the trash.
Short of banning every single “junk” food on the planet, there is nothing you can do. Human brains are hardwired to love high-calorie, fatty, sugary items. Period. It’s all about willpower and getting exercise.
Besides, is it really “junk” food or is it all about the calories? There are many people who have proved that you CAN live and thrive on “junk” food IF you keep the calories and portions reasonable:
Kansas State University nutrition professor Mark Haub lost 27 pounds in 10 weeks by consuming only 1,800 calories daily of junk food (Twinkies, Oreos, Doritos) to prove that calorie, not food quality, dictates weight loss. His body fat decreased, and blood markers improved: LDL dropped 20%, HDL rose 20%, and triglycerides fell 39%
How do you explain THAT, Comrade Clayton??
I’ll make you a bet, you dummy. I’ll do the SAME McDonald’s routine with YOU. I’ll bet you your $52,508 in campaign cash you have on hand that I can lose weight and improve my blood markers by eating nothing but McDonald’s for six weeks.
Deal? Yeah, that’s what I thought, you pussy.
Behold the female libdummy brain in action.
ALL their peabrains ‘work’ like this. Potato Head Fitzharris. Christine Seefeldt. Carol Garner Doughty. Julie Landrum. Clayton Tucker. All of them.
Which is why they shouldn’t be allowed to vote.
Yes, you read that right. Chicken-plugging, hay-bailing fake rancher retard Clayton Tucker is going to drive about 1,100 miles and over 17 hours to go to El Paso.
He’s ditching the Lampasas convention even though…
#1 – he is the Vice chair and was Chairman for a long time before that.
#2 – he claims Lampasas as his home town (it’s not – he’s from Georgetown)
#3 – he makes a big stink about caring more about the little rural guy than the urban dweller (Lampasas has 7,500 people and El Paso has almost a million). Here he is talking tough four years ago about turning rural areas blue:
That’s three kicks in the teeth to the Lampasas dems, by my count. His mother and Cyndy Burleson must be so disappointed.
It starts at 1pm tomorrow and FIVE people have already expressed interest in going! If the 2022 convention is any indication, tomorrow will be off the hook:
With any luck, an illegal Somali truck driver will end his campaign this weekend!
Whether he’s putting “a breaks” on data centers, “bailing” hay, “plugging” chickens, or getting his point about farming expense completely backwards, socialist fake rancher Clayton Tucker seems to be unable to perform the very simple task of getting his basic campaign material correct.
Behold his latest colossal fuck-up!
So his “ad” is trying to tell us that healthy food is expensive by design and processed shit foods are cheap by design. He goes on in his narration to tell us we simply need to “switch the equation.” Of course, he doesn’t tell us what the magic equation is or how to “switch” it around.
But look what the dumb, careless bastard did in his very own commercial:
He is trying to tell us healthy food is expensive and shitty food is cheap in his narration and on his Twitter post. But as he is saying that, the caption on the video tells us that “PROCESSED food is expensive” – the exact OPPOSITE of what he is saying in the voiceover!
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Whoever the dummy is making his “ads” was supposed to either put in a caption saying that “healthy food is expensive” or “processed food is cheap” but they fucked it all up. It says the OPPOSITE of what he wants.
Nobody noticed this humongous error. That is because everyone working on his campaign is a far-left, unemployed moron, just like Clayton Tucker.
As the candidate, Clayton should be going over his material with a fine-toothed comb to avoid further embarrassment. But he can’t even do that much. He’s too busy sucking down $9 Starbucks coffees and getting fat on Whataburger to bother with details.
What an absolute clown show. It is to laugh.
Some wiseacre on Twitter asked Grok if Clayton Tucker’s non-stop promises to “break up the monopolies” were within his power as Ag Commissioner. The results were just as I have been saying since the start:
Grok was emphatic and unequivocal in its answer:
Of course, I have been saying this since the very first time Clayton opened his lying commie mouth about it nine months ago. It’s pretty clear-cut and obvious. Even to Grok.
If he REALLY wanted to “bust monopolies” he would need to go to law school, pass the bar and then run for attorney general of Texas and win (HAHA!). Seeing as how he hasn’t even managed to move out of his parents’ house by age 35, that is simply never going to happen.
Plus it’s a lot easier to be a fake rancher than a fake lawyer. Being a fake lawyer can get you into serious legal trouble.
But Clayton is a compulsive liar who cares more about grifting old ladies by selling clichéd bumper-sticker slogans than sticking to the ACTUAL duties of Ag Commissioner.
Hey! Let’s see what Grok says about Ag Commissioner’s ability to have ANY say at all about data center water usage!
The answer?
No, the Texas Agriculture Commissioner does not have the authority to directly stop data centers from using water.
The role of the Texas Agriculture Commissioner primarily involves promoting agriculture, overseeing programs related to farming, ranching, food safety, and rural issues. It does not include regulatory power over water allocation, usage permits, or restrictions on non-agricultural industries like data centers.Water regulation in Texas is handled by other entities:
In short, while the commissioner can raise alarms, push for policy changes, and investigate specific cases (e.g., ag impacts), he cannot independently stop or restrict data centers’ water consumption. Any binding limits would require new laws from the Texas Legislature or actions by water/ utility regulators.
Well damn! There you have it: Comrade Clayton’s TWO BIG ISSUES (bust monopolies! Stop data center water usage!) are 100%, unquestionably and completely NOT within his power to affect AT ALL.
He knows this, too, of course. He chooses to ignore it and keep lying to the old ladies. Pathetic.
He has even enshrined the lies in the headline of his Twitter account! He admits he is running to do things he is powerless to do in reality….
Then again, four weeks ago he said he was running because he has food allergies. Go figure.