Bitter, Envious Socialist Clayton Tucker Libels Successful Businessman Nate Sheets.

Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: an unemployed loser and socialist who lives with his mother at age 35 is bitter and envious of man who is successful:

Clayton gives ZERO evidence for his outlandish claim. I have read nothing like that in all the articles I have read about Nate.

AI, which has access to every single thing ever written about Nate also disagrees with Comrade Clayton, the envious little twerp:

Just another lie by Clayton Tucker – I think we’re up to about 38 huge lies since I’ve been keeping track.

The truth is, it doesn’t matter to Clayton HOW Nate Sheets made his fortune. The problem for the envious, sad little socialist pussy is the word “fortune.” Clayton has nothing to his name because he is lazy and incompetent. But in his little tiny pea brain, the reason is because “oligarchs” and “monopolists” are “hoarding” all the money. They must have cheated him somehow and stole “his” money.

I have covered this before:

Clayton Tucker Is The Quintessential Grasshopper From Aesop’s Fable.

You see, the lazy incompetent socialist thinks that ANYBODY with wealth MUST have fucked everyone over and stolen it and couldn’t POSSIBLY have made it through hard work or through building a great product that people want badly. Never mind that Nate has provided well-paying jobs for a TON of people and Clayton Tucker has never employed a single person in his life. None of that matters to Clayton. He’s just envious that Nate has a “fortune” at all while Clayton himself lives with his mother.

There was a whole book written about this. It’s called Atlas Shrugged and it’s basically my bible. Clayton is the Wesley Mouch of Atlas Shrugged. A pathetic, weak scumbag who has never built anything in his life and is so envious of successful people, he wants to destroy them. Of course, Wesley Mouch is a politician. He is like Bernie Sanders or Clayton Tucker: sad, weak little pussies who have NEVER had a real job in their lives.

You might remember that Clayton Tucker was once a “beekeeper” years ago. He put it in his profile and then it eventually disappeared in favor of fake cowboy then fake rancher and fake farmer…

My guess is that Terry Tucker bought a bee hive for her aimless son back in 2017 or so and hoped he would maybe do something useful with his life. Clayton got all excited over his little bee hive and started calling himself a “beekeeper” because his resume had absolutely nothing else on it.

Then he probably forgot to feed them sugar water in the winter or was too lazy to go out in the cold to do it or he got stung once and then got scared of the bee hive in his yard. So he quit, like he quits everything else in his life.

Then the “beekeeper” in his profile went away.

I bet he has horrible, shameful memories of fucking up his beekeeping experience and remembers what a failure he was – so to now be running against a REAL beekeeper who made like $100 million must REALLY stick in Clayton’s craw. It is humiliating. You’d’ think Clayton would be used to humiliation by now the same way a fish is used to water, but maybe not.

While Nate was putting the work in all those years, here is what Clayton Tucker was doing:

He was ranting on a street corner demanding “free stuff” as a “political organizer” for a Bernie Sanders radical offshoot group called “Our Revolution.”

And now he’s bitter that he’s broke and living with mom while Nate is sitting on a pile of cash he earned.

Very sad.

Local Socialist Consumed With Envy

Shorty is in an absolute FRENZY of jealousy today!!

Socialism is built on the three-legged stool of envy, ignorance and faith. And boy, does local socialist Clayton Tucker SDEC-24 TX have the “envy” part in spades. He’s no slouch on ignorance either, as we have seen over the last several years. Today’s post shows both:

First of all, Chipotle’s CEO Brian Niccol did not get paid $38 million.

Niccol’s base salary of $1.25 million has not changed since 2020.

Many of these CEO’s get a salary of a million or two but then get stock-based bonuses if they perform well. When they perform well, it enriches ALL shareholders. Maybe if you ever got a job and invested, you’d appreciate that aspect.

According to proxy filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission Monday, Niccol earned a total of $17.2 million last year. That’s down from the $17.9 million in total compensation earned in 2021.

His Starbucks information is wrong as well:

Laxman Narasimhan started his tenure as CEO of Starbucks on Monday, nearly two weeks earlier than planned. He’s set to take home a hefty paycheck from his role. According to Securities and Exchange Commission filings from September, Narasimhan will start with a base salary of $1.3 million per year

I’m guessing Comrade Clayton doesn’t understand the difference between SALARY and other forms of compensation. This is where his IGNORANCE shows, once again.

Also telling is the fact that he doesn’t mention Tim Cook, the CEO of Apple. Tim Cook took home $98.7 million in 2021 and $99.4 million in 2022 – FAR more than anyone on your list. Why isn’t Tim on your list?

I’ll bet you a MILLLLLION DOLLARS that Comrade Clayton owns an iPhone. How about it, Comrade? Why did you spend all that money on an iPhone when their CEO is so “disgustingly overpaid”? Is it because Cook is a left-wing homo? Does he get a pass? Apple is also known for running sweatshops in China – you are literally monetarily supporting slave labor who are paid as little as $1.60 an hour. How does that fit into your “pay the common worker more” narrative?

I myself will never own an iPhone because (a) only chicks own iPhones (b) they are wildly overpriced compared to similar phones and (c) that asshole Al Gore sits on the board of directors for Apple and I don’t want ONE PENNY of my money going to that douche bag. See how the free market works? I detest Al Gore but my money isn’t going towards his compensation, so why waste any time thinking about it? I have voted with my wallet. End of story.

But whether the CEO pay is $2 million or $50 million, the bigger question is this: WHY DO YOU GIVE A SHIT??? If you don’t like it, then don’t buy Chipotle stock, don’t buy Chipotle’s shitty overpriced burritos and don’t work at Chipotle. That should be the end of it. It’s really none of your business at all what anyone at that company makes.

The funny thing is, I can almost guarantee you that Comrade Clayton spends his parents’ money on almost all of these company products. You don’t get a manfupa like his without a lot of Burger King and McDonald’s. Plus, any dude who owns a iPhone probably also buys Starbucks “coffees” with whipped cream and caramel drizzles all over it:

Instead of ranting on the Internet at noon on a work-day about CEO pay of a company you have nothing to do with, here are some more important areas you can direct your bitter energies towards:

Hitting gym to eliminate manfupa.

Finding gainful employment in the private sector so you can support yourself.

Saving enough money to move out of mom’s house and get your own place.

Finding a girlfriend and maybe getting laid.

Learn how the real economy works (books by Adam Smith, F. A. Hayek, Thomas Sowell, Ludwig Von Mises) instead of regurgitating tweets from a 96-year-old freeloading moron like Bernie Sanders.