City Council Extends Lockdown to April 30th. Unless You’re a Church. Then It’s OK To Gather In Crowds

Never thought I’d see a meeting where Mike White was wrong and Kathy Kuehne was right, but these are crazy times indeed.

The issue? Allowing churches to flout the lockdown that everyone else is suffering through and allow them to hold ‘parking lot services’, whatever that means. Apparently on-line services are not good enough, according to the likes of Councilwoman Delana Toups. The congregation all HAVE TO BE ALLOWED to drive to the parking lot and sit in their cars watching…with the engines off (and presumably windows up to prevent viral spread), according to Finley.

Ironically, Delana is a public school teacher currently conducting classes five days a week over the Internet (LOL)….and that appears to be ‘good enough’ for her. Yet watching a religious service over the TV or Internet once a week just won’t cut it. Very weird.

But here is my big question: will the churches be allowed to “pass the plate” and collect money from everyone in their cars? NOBODY on City council asked that all-important question. Because if they DO, that kind of defeats Misti’s big plan that the rest of us are suffering to implement.

Call me a cynic, but I suspect the reason the churches want a parking lot service in the first place is because when people watch online, they can’t hand money to the guy with the basket or plate! Easter Sunday is this weekend and I bet those churches would be missing out on a LOT OF CHEDDAR!! It’s the Super Bowl of religious days and the churches want their cut.

I know, I know…I’m an asshole for even thinking that. But hey – 12 years of Catholic school taught me that the church is like any other business except they push guilt and then sell salvation….all while avoiding property taxes! I’m thinking of starting one myself, as a matter of fact.

But here’s the thing: I’m personally NOT religious at all…BUT I still enjoy attending services at Putters and Gutters or Memos on Sundays. Vodka is my god and greasy food is my communion….and I am being DENIED my right to congregate and worship! Yet the other churches are allowed to operate. I don’t care what you believe or where you congregate to hand over your money – but I’d like the ability to do the same.

Delana Toups is just fine with this hypocrisy. Oh well, at least the stupid Tree Police idea has been forgotten for the moment!

City Finance Director Moreno Either Lying or Terrible at Math…Perhaps Both.

It all started with this nugget I stumbled upon in the Lampasas Dispatch archives (Aug 4, 2017 page 5 column 4) during a City council discussion about the skyrocketing cost of health insurance premiums for City employees (also known as “benefits” – which Finley ALWAYS ignores during any and all discussions of City employee salaries, btw):

Ms Moreno said premiums will not necessarily increase significantly each year, as she said the main factor is TOTAL HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS BY CITY EMPLOYEES. The big increase in premiums for the upcoming year, she said, is TIED TO CLAIMS which Ms Moreno said MORE THAN DOUBLED OVER THE LAST YEAR.” [emphasis mine]

Wow! A DOUBLING of insurance claims in one year. That sounded almost impossible to me, so I wanted to know the actual numbers. Also, if the main factor in the ever-skyrocketing health insurance premiums is CLAIMS by City employees, then maybe we need to have a discussion about WHY claims are doubling. Are there a lot of morbidly obese City employees? Chain smokers? If so, those sure sound like personal choices to me. Maybe the FAIR thing to do is pile more cost onto those people who incur them.

So I emailed my usual City contacts and made a formal records request. I asked for the dollar amount of TOTAL claims made by City employees for the years 2010 through 2019, inclusive. I figured a ten-year span would give me a good look at the trajectory of these costs.

First, I got a run-around about how this might violate patient privacy….which is absurd. I pointed out that the City Finance Director ALREADY opened her cake hole about this IN THE NEWSPAPER. So it hardly made sense that this was top-secret information.

Then, I FINALLY got a response from the City attorney, Jo Christy Brown (who has likely made a small fortune in billable hours to the City, thanks to my requests over the last couple of years being constantly stonewalled). JC gave me the following information:

Fiscal period 2015/2016: $706,186

Fiscal period 2016/2017: $1,113,635

She informed me that records before the 2015/16 period were “are not retained by the City” and that the 2018/2019 period was “not yet finalized”.

I asked about the 2017/2018 period in a response email, since she didn’t mention it. Oh, says JC Brown, “that amount is not available at this time either, according to research done by the City

Yeah right. Bullshit. Not available two years after the fact??

So of course, my next email asks: Will it EVER be available? Is it just ‘not yet finalized’? Or ‘not retained by the City’ either? Which b.s. line would I get for that year?

Her response: I have no way of predicting that.

This is the point I start laughing at Misti Talbert’s yammering about “transparency in City government” she did on Feb 10th. I mean, really. Ya’ll wonder why I attack you relentlessly on your lies and obfuscation (look it up, Monica) – this is a PRIME example.

Of course, I refuse to take this bullshit as truth. I also see right away that the measly two years of data they give me shows a 58% increase in claims – not the 100% Moreno claims in the newspaper. So either Moreno is atrocious at math since 58% is nowhere NEAR 100% OR Moreno actually does have more data from past years and refuses to divulge it.

SO…I email Moreno (with a CC to Finley – the City manager) and ask her point blank about the discrepancy. I got a lot of “to the best of my knowledge” and “that information is no longer available”…blah, blah blah.

I pressed again by email and got no response for an entire week. I then emailed Moreno and Finley AGAIN to ask if my original email was received. JC Brown was quick to jump in and stonewall for them. I could almost picture Finley hiding behind his desk while JC bullshitted for him. JC tells me:

Your original inquiry seeking medical and life insurance data was received by the City on March 10th, and although your questions did not fall within the Texas Public Information Act, as a courtesy to you, the staff searched for data and asked that I provide you with the limited information that remained available to the staff.  I provided that to you via my correspondence dated March 23rd. No additional data will be provided.”

As a courtesy to me! How nice. How DARE the private taxpayer citizen disturb the parasites and loaches who suckle at their teat.

Of course, I strongly disagree that it doesn’t fall within the Texas Public Information Act: Moreno was discussing those figures IN THE NEWSPAPER.

Not to mention: City council SHOULD be using that very information to determine if they are being screwed by their insurance carrier every year during budgeting discussions.

Lastly, YOU JUST GAVE ME TWO YEARS OF DATA, so if it’s unethical to provide this info, then why provide any at all?

Therefore, my lawyer will once again go up against Finley and JC Brown.

It’s pathetic that the City is wasting money paying an attorney to spend time DENYING public information to the public. This is not the first time it has happened either. I know City council reads here. I wonder how they feel about tax dollars being wasted on denying information to the public.

I’ll dissect this further in the next post…and reveal further evidence that these clowns are lying.


Transparency In City Government Is a Bad Joke

I had a good laugh a few weeks ago when Mayor Talbert opined at the end of a City council meeting [go to the 1:26:45 mark and listen for 45 seconds] about how citizens should be able to ask department heads anything and get answers…that there should be complete transparency.

Her exact words: “I feel like (City) staff and Council oughta be tasked with being accountable to answer on the spot…and..uh…I would be comfortable doing that….that’s transparency at its finest…is…you know…we don’t put off a question, we answer it on the spot”

I chuckled because every single time I ask a department head (IT, LEDC, Finance, etc) OR even Finley himself a question that might actually make them look negligent, incompetent or profligate, ‘transparency’ goes right out the window. This is evidenced by my past questions about the no-bid Azbell A/V contract, the LEDC and ‘business park’ contracts, employee discipline questions, ransomware attack questions…..the list literally goes on and on.

In fact, this ENTIRE BLOG only exists because I asked IT DIRECTOR Monica Wright (July of 2018) a simple question about what appeared to be a ridiculously overpriced NO-BID audio/visual system from Azbell Electronics for the new Council chambers. Her response? To copy and paste a couple sentences from the Azbell bid sheet! When I pressed her, Finley took over immediately and shut down all lines of inquiry. Seems to be a pattern with all “department heads” – they aren’t actually ‘head’ of jack shit, but rather a Finley Finger Puppet dancing to his tune.

Well, I have apparently opened an whole NEW can of worms regarding the City’s health insurance premiums and payouts. I had recently politely requested information that is WELL WITHIN my rights as a taxpaying citizen and guess what? Finance Department head Yvonne Moreno and City manager Finley ‘Elmo” deGraffenreid are once again hiding behind their City attorney and stonewalling me.

When that happens, I just KNOW I am on to a big stinky pile of dogshit they prefer to keep hidden. Good thing I still have MY lawyer on retainer.

Details coming up very shortly! I know you all need SOMETHING to keep you entertained during quarantine. Until then, let’s watch Finley ‘Elmo’ deGraffenreid make the Seven Goldfish dance to his tune…

“I Haven’t Paid Income Taxes In 23 Years….Where’s My Free Money??” – Bruce Haywood

Shocker. The brain-dead Democrat who is always happy to see the government spend more money and thinks big government is the answer to everything actually contributes NOTHING!!! Color me stunned.

It takes some REAL nerve to go on a public forum, admit you pay zero to the feds for most of your adult life, then ask for a check from the very same federal government. Bruce, I thought you were just a garden variety moron Democrat before this. Now I see you are an unabashed parasite as well. Disgusting.

Almost as bad as the other idiots who ask “Hey, I get disability checks….do I get a stimulus check too?”. Seriously – how many times does the government have to send you a check for not working? If you are disabled and not working (REALLY disabled…not ‘depressed’ or 500 pounds overweight from eating McDonald’s every day), then how has your life changed due to a virus, exactly? You’re STILL not working and you are already taken care of. Yet you want to steal more from the productive citizen.

Maybe this country NEEDS a plague. Get rid of the 40 million parasites who ask questions like this and say “gimme gimme gimme”.

Virus Reveals Financial Irresponsibility of Most Americans

How long could you sustain your household if you were to stop earning income? If you are like most Americans, the answer is not for long. Only 40 percent of Americans can afford an unexpected $1,000 expense with their savings. In fact, nearly 80 percent of workers are living paycheck to paycheck. It is no surprise that the probability of an economic recession brought on by the coronavirus pandemic caused many to worry.

In major cities such as Boston, New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco, restaurants and businesses have been ordered to close. For many hourly workers, this means no paychecks in the coming weeks. Almost one in five Americans have already lost their jobs or have reduced hours. At the same time, salaried workers are concerned about job security, as mass layoffs at numerous companies loom. While the situation is understandably stressful for every person affected, it serves as a sobering reminder that Americans must learn to live within their means and regularly save money.

The need for all Americans to be able to sustain themselves for at least a few months on savings is accentuated during a time of crisis. This means planning ahead when times are good. Financial planners suggest saving at least 20 percent of take home income, while spending at most 30 percent on discretionary items. Yet too many workers still fail to think twice about spending entire paychecks for things they WANT but do not NEED.

Recent decades have offered us relative luxury. More than 80 percent of Americans own smartphones. The same portion of households own one high definition flat screen television, while over half of households own more than one. Over 60 percent of Americans dine out at least once a week, while nearly 20 percent dine out three or more times a week.

The current panic is refocusing us on what is important. We now stockpile the things necessary for our health. Smartphones, fancy televisions, and restaurant meals are usually luxuries rather than necessities. Living within our means is not just rhetoric. It is a means of guarding ourselves during times like these. We have so much to learn from those who came before us. How many of our grandparents fared the austerity of the World Wars and the Great Depression, discovering to save, mend, and repair?

The availability of credit gave us an opportunity with a great hangover. It made nice homes, flashy cars, and expensive consumer products within reach for earners across income levels. But purchasing on installment is often a trap and a major contributor to our $14 trillion in consumer debt. Financing items as diverse as furniture, laptops, clothing, and more with easily obtained credit opened the door to fiscal recklessness. Consider that average Americans spend $800 monthly on car payments.

It is not only low income and middle income earners who blow through their paychecks every month. Many high income earners also live above their means. Indeed, at least a quarter of households making $150,000 and above live paycheck to paycheck. Our fiscal irresponsibility means that when an unexpected crisis like the one today hits, Americans are unable to sustain their own families, even for a short time period.

While our leaders must act decisively in times of disaster, our own errors have made this situation untenable over the long run. On top of consumer debt, our government holds $23 trillion in national debt. A combination of stimulus checks, a potential recession, and new bureaucracies to oversee a recovery will further accelerate our rendezvous with financial default in the next generation. The money will eventually come due in the form of taxes, deferred payments for benefit programs, or outright inflation.

We each have a civic responsibility to our families and to our country. The more fiscal control we show at the kitchen table, the better our ability to handle the next crisis. A solid balance of fiscal government and personal finance courses at the high school level is a start. For most young people, however, true financial literacy is taught at home. We have a chance to show the next generation that saving is earning by another means.

Remember This In July and August…

I remember when I was a kid, the old saying was “government work doesn’t pay that well, but the benefits are awesome, and you can basically never get fired”.

Fair enough. You forgo massive paychecks BUT you can count on that paycheck AND top-notch medical and retirement benefits. No matter what. That means zero stress in your life.

Of course, things are quite different nowadays. Many government workers get all three of those things. Paychecks that FAR EXCEED similar work in the private sector PLUS job security AND gold-plated medical benefits.

So right now, when small business owners are struggling to stay afloat and pay their employees while everyone in the private sector is being laid off, I hope the millions and millions and millions of government workers appreciate that they have exactly ZERO worries about losing their jobs or missing a paycheck. After all, the government can just go squeeze the taxpayer a little harder.

They are ALSO all covered by the City’s gold-plated medical insurance – in case they DO catch this virus. Must be nice not to worry about that either. Very nice indeed. Those are the TWO huge worries facing everyone in the private sector right now, and the government workers don’t have a care in the world. Think about that.

[I have to assume they will ALSO be handed that $1,200 government check soon…with $500 for each of their kids! Talk about double dipping: you never lost your job, never in danger of losing your job, your paycheck wasn’t interrupted AND you have health care benefits better than probably 90% of us suckers who pay your salaries! Why exactly are you being handed more government checks?? A good question.]

I hope City council remembers this fact in July and August when the City budget is being negotiated and they are worried the City workers will “lose morale”*** if they don’t get yet another 3 or 4% raise this year. I would hope the minute a government worker (including Finley) cries about a raise, someone on City council smacks them in the ear and reminds them of this. Then do it again every year for the next ten years. Same goes for public school teachers (who received some massive raises just weeks before this coronavirus disaster hit….talk about lucky timing).

Unfortunately, since City council is comprised of a majority (4 out of 7 members) who owe their livings to the taxpayer and NOT the private sector, I doubt this point will be driven home or remembered. Again, it is a damn shame we don’t have seven Mike Whites up there negotiating on behalf of the taxpayer.

Here is what it’s like out in the real world – for all you Monicas, Kristys, Finleys and Morenos at City Hall who might cry about ‘morale’ if they don’t get their raise AND all their benefits.

[*** – this phrase was actually used by City finance Director Yvonne Moreno on August 4th, 2017 [link HERE page 5]. Benefits costs were soaring and Moreno was concerned some Department heads might see slightly less take-home pay and ‘lose morale’ (never mind the taxpayer had just covered a huge increase in their insurance premiums). We’ll get into Ms. Moreno and her health care numbers in an upcoming post]

Mayor ‘Pendulum’ Swings Too Far The Other Way Now

Oh the irony.

A mere nine days after whining on Facebook that social media was making a mountain out of a coronavirus mole hill, Mayor “Pendulum” Talbert has swung way too far the OTHER way and announced (on her hated social media, no less!) that the tiny town of Lampasas (population density 1000 people per square mile) is now on lockdown – just like New York City.

FYI, New York City has a population density of about 28,000 per square mile AND has HALF of all coronavirus cases in the country right now. So a lockdown there makes total sense.

Talk about hysteria!

All “non-essential” businesses are now closed. Of course, the list of ‘essential’ businesses is long and distinguished. Like my schlong. So not much has REALLY changed except hair dressers and barbers are getting a big fat shaft. I guess Mayor Pendulum needed to look ‘mayoral’ and DO SOMETHING…even though the state has already put guidelines in place that seem like MORE than enough to most people.

I’m thinking this act of ‘hysteria’ and unnecessary EXTRA orders on TOP of the Governor’s orders will mark the peak of panic for this whole episode. Italy is already seeing a small drop in the rate of daily deaths. I think the thing she doesn’t understand (math again!) is that fully HALF of the cases are in New York City. And most of the rest are in Washington and California. In terms of cases PER CAPITA, Texas is already doing extremely well with the measures taken weeks ago. So Mayor Pendulum’s actions sure seem ridiculous and unwarranted…and are angering a few people!

Poor Mayor Pendulum…wrong TWICE in ten days!

Neither Of These Dummies Should Be On City Council

The Dispatch is going to start providing us with backgrounds and positions for everyone running for City Council this spring. Place 3 incumbent dingbat Chuck Williamson is being challenged by Gordon Nelson…who also appears to be a dingbat of a different sort.

I’ll go through the pros and cons of each.

Chuck Williamson pros: none

Chuck Williamson cons: has never held a private sector job, as far as I can tell. Has been on City Council for at least the last six years – and was thus part of the profligate spending and idiotic decisions made during that time. Including the $1.5 million vanity project, the $185,000 no-bid bathroom, and all the rest. Chuck also at one point a long time ago said “the City is giving too much away” but then voted to give more away to private developers like Deorald Finney and his Stone Valley subdivision in the form of “free” electrical hookups – not to mention S2M2 and former fellow Council turd ‘Greasy’ Chris Harrison. Chuck also favored all the money wasted in the ‘business park’ boondoggle. Chuck’s grade: F

Gordon Nelson pros: calls out City council for stupid spending and specifically mentions the $185,000 bathroom in Campbell Park (Dispatch page 5 – 3/23/20).

Gordon Nelson cons: manages to still wuss out and say “I’m not saying the City Council is spending foolishly, but they’re not spending wisely“. [Wrong Gordo…they are spending foolishly]. Gordon has ALSO never worked in the private sector – huge negative. Gordon unfortunately has a hard-on for a ‘community center’. Which I guess is better than having a hard-on for a ‘civic center’ but not by much. Let’s see how the City handles their new management of the Hostess House, before we bite off more than we can chew….shall we? Intangible: Gordy’s newspaper interview makes him sound less than brilliant. Maybe he just isn’t a very good interviewer? Gordon’s grade: D-

It is a crying shame that Mike White is hanging up his cleats soon. His seat will be fought over by two other people…who I will grade just as soon as their profiles are printed in the newspaper.

Mike has what just about everyone else on City council doesn’t: experience running a successful business in the private sector. He understands the value of a dollar. It is no coincidence he was often the lone voice of sanity and fiscal restraint during council meetings. One Mike White is worth ten of these other bozos. As it is, at LEAST four of the seven current council members owe their life-long earnings to the taxpayer.

As for the other two members, I have no clue what TJ Monroe used to do, but she has been on Council since the earth cooled and seems to ALWAYS vote for more spending and stupid projects. Misti seems hardwired to spend huge amounts of money. Not sure if that is a chick thing or a Misti thing.

Bottom line: we need MORE dudes who have run successful businesses in this town to get on City council. The problem is, they are all busy trying to keep a bunch of eggs in the air – taking care of customers, employees and suppliers all while government at all levels tries to pick their pocket and regulate them into oblivion.

Mike White retiring is a huge blow to the City.

CEO Pigs and Weasels

We are told to have six months saved in case of emergency. Some of us try hard to achieve this. Meanwhile, corporate America declares incolvcency after 3.5 weeks?? Send the bastards packing. Rip the c-suiters out of their offices, strip them naked, and do that Game of Thrones thing.

Ban share buybacks – forever. Claw back the last six years of CEO and other corporate bonuses based entirely on pumping up the stock price by borrowing cheap money and buying your own stock. THEN we can maybe talk about some LOANS…not giveaways.

Airlines Who Spent BILLIONS and BILLIONS Buying Back Their Shares At Nosebleed Prices Now Want Bailouts

Hello, US airlines!

We, the American people, thank you for your recent bailout request.

We understand that you would like us to provide you with at least $54 billion so that you can avoid bankruptcy.

We value your service to us. We also value the Americans you employ, and the salaries and benefits you compensate them with. You and your employees spend money on other products and services other American companies and workers provide. We want to help your employees, so we will help you. Please see our terms below.

Before we begin, let us say that we sympathize with the bad luck you are experiencing. The coronavirus pandemic has been a terrible blow for all of us. We understand that it has been particularly hard on you.

Your request

You estimate that you will burn through $23 billion to $53 billion of cash by the end of the year, and that, without assistance, you may soon go bankrupt, perhaps as early as May or June.

You are therefore requesting a $54+ billion bailout, structured as follows:

  • $29 billion of “grants”
  • $25 billion of loans
  • Forgiveness of taxes on tickets, cargo, and fuel for two years

Our terms

First, some context. Please understand that times are tough for us, too. Lots of us are getting hammered as well.

Also, two years ago, our government enacted a corporate tax cut that saved you and other US companies hundreds of billions of dollars. This tax cut benefited you and your shareholders, but it also ballooned our annual government deficit to more than $1 trillion a year.

With the coronavirus now plunging our economy into recession, our tax revenue will tank, and our deficit will skyrocket even more, perhaps to $2 trillion or $3 trillion per year. So we’re not as flush as we should have been.

Second, over the past decade, you raked in tens of billions of dollars of profit and, instead of saving it, gave it to your shareholders.

As you know well — and as you point out in your financial filings — your business is cyclical. So cyclical, in fact, that many of you have already gone bankrupt in the past. So you could have saved this cash for a rainy day. But you didn’t.

Instead, according to Bloomberg, you used a startling 96% of your cash flow to buy back your own stock. The buybacks of one of your members alone, American Airlines, totaled more than $15 billion in the past six years. ($15 billion! American, if you had just kept that cash, you might not need a bailout!)

[More detailed analysis on airline stock buybacks HERE]

Third, although the coronavirus pandemic is bad luck, it was not unforeseeable. In fact, at least one of your members, American Airlines, explicitly foresaw it. In recent financial filings, American cited “outbreaks of diseases that affect travel behavior” as a major risk to its business. American went on to say the following:

In particular, an outbreak of a contagious disease such as the Ebola virus, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, H1N1 influenza virus, avian flu, Zika virus or any other similar illness, if it were to become associated with air travel or persist for an extended period, could materially affect the airline industry and us by reducing revenues and adversely impacting our operations and passengers’ travel behavior.

American sure got that right!

But, despite this and roughly 45 other explicit risks to its business described in its financial filings, American Airlines STILL chose to spend over $15 billion of precious cash on stock buybacks.

So, while we sympathize with your plight, please understand that we’re not going to just “grant” you the money. The philosophy of our economic system is not “shareholders and executives take the gains and taxpayers take the losses.”

You and your shareholders and lenders knew the risks you were taking, and, for more than a decade, you enjoyed the rewards.

Also, you aren’t the only ones who need our help. Just ask the cruise lines, hotel companies, and restaurants, bars, gyms, and other establishments in so many of our American communities that have been forced to close altogether —as well as the millions of Americans who will soon be laid off.

So, your $54+ billion bailout will be structured as follows:

  • A senior, secured credit line that will allow you to borrow the money you need to operate and pay your taxes while you figure out how to survive.

This credit line will pay interest at a rate that compensates taxpayers for the use of our money and the risks we are taking. The use of this credit line will also require you to issue equity to taxpayers to allow us to share in your recoveries, if any. Yes, this equity issuance will dilute your shareholders and cause your stock prices to drop. But not as much as they will if you go bust.

Our credit line, moreover, will be senior to all of your other debt and secured by your airplanes and other assets. If, despite our help, you fail, we will sell your airplanes and recoup 100 cents on our dollars before any of your other lenders get a penny.

To be clear, we are not in the investment business. We are the “lender of last resort.” We do not think all or even most of you will survive this crisis, and we do not expect to make money on this transaction. We are angry that you did not conserve your cash for this rainy day, and if we did not have an economy to save and millions of Americans to help, we would just let you fail.

If you think you can get better terms from another investor, we encourage you to get them. We are offering you this lifeline because we benefit from having an airline industry and the jobs and services it provides. In this time of national crisis, we also do not think it is in our interests to let all of you go bankrupt at once.

Thank you again for your request. We look forward to working with you.

Sincerely,

The American people