A New York Times op-ed suggests that everyone should “mate with shorter people” in order to save the planet.
I always felt kind of sorry for the midget people. She/him short people like Clayton Tucker can’t do a damn thing about being 5’6 – just bad luck. Then again, suckling at mom’s tit until age 32 might be a factor, I suppose. I always felt they should get some kind of discount in life, or something. Like kids eating at an IHOP.
But now the beta male soy boy cucks are trying to convince us that’s a GOOD thing.
Seriously.
Author Mara Altman, claims that “When you mate with shorter people, you’re potentially saving the planet by shrinking the needs of subsequent generations.”
“Lowering the height minimum for prospective partners on your dating profile is a step toward a greener planet,” she adds in the piece.
Altman argues that shorter people are “inherent conservationists, which is more crucial than ever in this world of eight billion,” adding that “if we kept our proportions the same but were just 10 percent shorter in America alone, we would save 87 million tons of food per year (not to mention trillions of gallons of water, quadrillions of B.T.U.s of energy and millions of tons of trash).”
Altman continues, “Short people don’t just save resources, but as resources become scarcer because of the earth’s growing population and global warming, they may also be best suited for long-term survival (and not just because more of us will be able to jam into spaceships when we are forced off this planet we wrecked).”
“Our success as individuals does not depend on beating up other people or animals. Even if it did, in an era of guns and drones, being tall now just makes you a bigger target,” Altman adds, concluding “I want my children’s children to know the value of short.”
Twitter wasted no time in ceaselessly mocking the piece:
